Poética, ciencia y polémica
Every approach to Lope de Vega´s miscellaneous collection, framed in Gongora´s controversy, recovers in the first place the epistles that follow the “Papel que escribió un señor de estos reinos a Lope de Vega Carpio en razón de la nueva poesía” (“Paper written by a gentleman of these kingdoms to Lop...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Publicado: |
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/fichas.php?idobjeto=13397 |
| Sumario: | Every approach to Lope de Vega´s miscellaneous collection, framed in Gongora´s controversy, recovers in the first place the epistles that follow the “Papel que escribió un señor de estos reinos a Lope de Vega Carpio en razón de la nueva poesía” (“Paper written by a gentleman of these kingdoms to Lope de Vega Carpio in relation to new poetry”). However, the spirit of debate does not end there, since it is present in the metaliterary comments of Las fortunas de Diana, as well as in the many poems the work is composed of.
Here we will deal with other epistles from La Filomena, the series of poetic epistles presented in the text following La Andrómeda. In them, and by means of Horatio´s model , Lope presents his opinión about new poetry, critics, good or bad poets, in a dialectic play that enriches the debates appeared around the publication of Góngora´s great poems. Thus he has a new chance to validate that image of “poet scientist” he had started sketching in La Arcadia which is finally discursevely consolidated in La Dorotea. |
|---|
