La odisea de un concepto nómada
New paradigm for someones, or simple political - media slogan for others, sustentable development concept raises contradictory reactions in the scientific world. Notable differences exist in the approximation to sustentable development among the representers of natural sciences and those of human...
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Proyección |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/fichas.php?idobjeto=3239 |
| descriptores_str_mv |
Bosque sustentable Ciudad sustentable Concepto nómada Desarrollo sustentable Geografía Geografía de las Utopías Geography of Utopias Nomadic concept Sustentable city Sustentable development Sustentable forest |
|---|---|
| todos_str_mv |
3063 3236 spa |
| autor_str_mv |
Clement, Vincent |
| disciplina_str_mv |
Geografía |
| titulo_str_mv |
La odisea de un concepto nómada The odyssey of a nomadic concept |
| description_str_mv |
New paradigm for someones, or simple political - media slogan for others, sustentable development concept raises
contradictory reactions in the scientific world. Notable differences exist in the approximation to sustentable
development among the representers of natural sciences and those of human sciences.
The nomadic character of sustentable development concept (Stengers, 1987) is perceived by certain geography
researchers as a real genetic tare, when on the contrary others think that it can use as lever to renew the
geographical approximation to the big contemporary problems.
For geographical research, what attitude is suitable to adopt? Can sustentable development, as nomadic concept,
turn into an effective and innovative tool? Or does semantic incertidumbre lead us in an inexorable way towards a
drifting of ideas?
The central aim of this reflection is to try to place sustentable development concept in the orbit of the geographical
thought, in a comparative optics with neighboring disciplines and questioning his interest for our disciplinary field
investigation. For this reason, first of all it is necessary to approach the problems raised by this concept without taboo:
must it be considered the conceptual nomadism of the sustentable development as a kind of original sin that would
turn it into an inoperative instrument for the geography?
Secondly, demythologizing the apparent innovation of the concept, is convenient to analyze which are its filiations
with the geography and other disciplines. And finally, to raise concrete cases of the concept use in the geographical
investigation (sustentable city, sustentable forest), underlining contributions, but also putting to the light its limits. Nuevo paradigma para algunos, o simple eslogan político-mediático para otros, el concepto de desarrollo sustentable levanta reacciones contradictorias en el mundo científico. Existen notables diferencias en el acercamiento al desarrollo sustentable entre los representantes de las ciencias naturales y los de las ciencias humanas. El carácter nómada del concepto (Stengers, 1987) de desarrollo sustentable es percibido por ciertos investigadores en geografía como una verdadera tara genética, cuando otros piensan por el contrario que puede servir de palanca para renovar el acercamiento geográfico a los grandes problemas contemporáneos. ¿Para la investigación en geografía, qué postura es conveniente adoptar? ¿El desarrollo sustentable, como concepto nómada, puede convertirse en una herramienta eficaz e innovadora? ¿O bien su incertidumbre semántica nos conduce de manera inexorable hacia un vagabundeo de las ideas? El objetivo central de esta reflexión es intentar situar el concepto de desarrollo sustentable en la órbita del pensamiento geográfico, en una óptica comparativa con disciplinas vecinas y cuestionando a su vez su interés para la investigación en nuestro campo disciplinario. Para ello, es necesario en primer lugar acercarse sin tabúes a los problemas planteados por este concepto: ¿Debe considerarse el nomadismo conceptual del desarrollo sustentable como una especie de pecado original que lo convertiría en un instrumento inoperante para la geografía? En segundo lugar, desmitificando la novedad aparente del concepto, conviene analizar cuáles son sus filiaciones con la geografía y otras disciplinas. Y finalmente, plantear casos concretos de utilización del concepto en la investigación geográfica (ciudad sustentable; bosques sustentables), subrayando sus aportes, pero también poniendo a la luz sus límites. |
| object_type_str_mv |
Textual: Revistas |
| id |
3239 |
| plantilla_str |
Artículo de Revista |
| record_format |
article |
| container_title |
Proyección |
| journal_title_str |
Proyección |
| journal_id_str |
r-3063 |
| container_issue |
Proyección |
| container_volume |
No. 4 |
| journal_issue_str |
No. 4 |
| tipo_str |
textuales |
| type_str_mv |
Articulos |
| title_full |
La odisea de un concepto nómada |
| title_fullStr |
La odisea de un concepto nómada La odisea de un concepto nómada |
| title_full_unstemmed |
La odisea de un concepto nómada La odisea de un concepto nómada |
| description |
New paradigm for someones, or simple political - media slogan for others, sustentable development concept raises
contradictory reactions in the scientific world. Notable differences exist in the approximation to sustentable
development among the representers of natural sciences and those of human sciences.
The nomadic character of sustentable development concept (Stengers, 1987) is perceived by certain geography
researchers as a real genetic tare, when on the contrary others think that it can use as lever to renew the
geographical approximation to the big contemporary problems.
For geographical research, what attitude is suitable to adopt? Can sustentable development, as nomadic concept,
turn into an effective and innovative tool? Or does semantic incertidumbre lead us in an inexorable way towards a
drifting of ideas?
The central aim of this reflection is to try to place sustentable development concept in the orbit of the geographical
thought, in a comparative optics with neighboring disciplines and questioning his interest for our disciplinary field
investigation. For this reason, first of all it is necessary to approach the problems raised by this concept without taboo:
must it be considered the conceptual nomadism of the sustentable development as a kind of original sin that would
turn it into an inoperative instrument for the geography?
Secondly, demythologizing the apparent innovation of the concept, is convenient to analyze which are its filiations
with the geography and other disciplines. And finally, to raise concrete cases of the concept use in the geographical
investigation (sustentable city, sustentable forest), underlining contributions, but also putting to the light its limits. |
| dependencia_str_mv |
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras |
| title |
La odisea de un concepto nómada |
| spellingShingle |
La odisea de un concepto nómada Bosque sustentable Ciudad sustentable Concepto nómada Desarrollo sustentable Geografía Geografía de las Utopías Geography of Utopias Nomadic concept Sustentable city Sustentable development Sustentable forest Clement, Vincent |
| topic |
Bosque sustentable Ciudad sustentable Concepto nómada Desarrollo sustentable Geografía Geografía de las Utopías Geography of Utopias Nomadic concept Sustentable city Sustentable development Sustentable forest |
| topic_facet |
Bosque sustentable Ciudad sustentable Concepto nómada Desarrollo sustentable Geografía Geografía de las Utopías Geography of Utopias Nomadic concept Sustentable city Sustentable development Sustentable forest |
| author |
Clement, Vincent |
| author_facet |
Clement, Vincent |
| title_sort |
La odisea de un concepto nómada |
| title_short |
La odisea de un concepto nómada |
| url |
https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/fichas.php?idobjeto=3239 |
| estado_str |
3 |
| building |
Biblioteca Digital |
| filtrotop_str |
Biblioteca Digital |
| collection |
Artículo de Revista |
| institution |
Sistema Integrado de Documentación |
| indexed_str |
2023-04-25 00:38 |
| _version_ |
1764120336475881472 |
