La Corte Suprema de Justicia argentina y el liberalismo económico a principios del siglo XX
During the first decades of the 20º century the Argentine National Supreme Court of Justice rejected state Interventionism and embraced economic Liberalism, defending laissez-faire. The present study traces the sources that inspired the Court's ideology from an integrated perspective that bri...
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Estudios sociales contemporáneos |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/fichas.php?idobjeto=5115 |
| Sumario: | During the first decades of the 20º century the Argentine National Supreme Court
of Justice rejected state Interventionism and embraced economic Liberalism, defending laissez-faire. The present study traces the sources that inspired the
Court's ideology from an integrated perspective that brings together Law and
Social Science, in order to place jurisprudence in its context and thus better
understand legal phenomena. Indeed, court rulings are underpinned by
Constitutional Law doctrines which stem from given lines of legal thinking, which
in turn respond to a certain political and philosophical positioning.
The study focuses on the principies of economic Liberalism and American
Constitutionalism, the influence of outstanding jurists such as Thomas Me Intyre
Cooley, Christopher Tiedeman and Joseph Story, the underlying constitutional
bases, and the doctrines by Juan Bautista Alberdi that provide a foundation to
such rulings. Documentary sources consulted included, among others, the official
edition of the National Supreme Court Rulings and Reports of their Respective
Proceedings and specific bibliography on American political-constitutional
thinking.
|
|---|
