Doing a systematic review in health sciences /
This paper aims to provide a practical, summarized, and clear guide of steps to carry out a systematic review and is aimed at researchers in the field of Health Sciences. The review process runs from the initial questioning to the final report, providing useful information on tools available at each...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
[Madrid] :
Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid,
2020.
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://elibro.net/ereader/siduncu/133886 |
| LEADER | 02584nab a2200457 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELB133886 | ||
| 003 | FINmELB | ||
| 005 | 20230620121057.0 | ||
| 006 | m o u | ||
| 007 | cr cn||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 230522c20209999sp tr p o 0 0eng d | ||
| 022 | |a 1130-5274 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1385417945 | ||
| 040 | |a FINmELB |b spa |e rda |c FINmELB | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a RC467 |b .C353 2020 | |
| 080 | |a 616.89-07 | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 616.89 |2 23 |
| 100 | 1 | |a Cajala, Berta, |e autor. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Doing a systematic review in health sciences / |c Berta Cajala, Rafael Jiménez, Elena Gervilla, and Juan J. Montaño. |
| 264 | 1 | |a [Madrid] : |b Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid, |c 2020. | |
| 310 | |a Cuatrimestral | ||
| 336 | |a texto |b txt |2 rdacontent/spa | ||
| 337 | |a computadora |b c |2 rdamedia/spa | ||
| 338 | |a recurso en línea |b cr |2 rdacarrier/spa | ||
| 520 | |a This paper aims to provide a practical, summarized, and clear guide of steps to carry out a systematic review and is aimed at researchers in the field of Health Sciences. The review process runs from the initial questioning to the final report, providing useful information on tools available at each stage. Systematic review and meta-analysis are currently the evidence synthesis tools of the highest level of scientific quality. They are in themselves a secondary research methodology, whose objective is to locate, evaluate, and synthesize the best evidence by selecting original papers or quality primary publications. The procedure to achieve the objective is presented as a sequential and systematized process, in stages, following the transparency principle, so as to ensure its replicability. | ||
| 588 | |a Descripción basada en Clínica y salud, vol. 31, núm. 2 (2020), P. 77-83. | ||
| 588 | |a Descripción basada en metadatos suministrados por el editor y otras fuentes. | ||
| 590 | |a Recurso electrónico. Santa Fe, Arg.: elibro, 2023. Disponible vía World Wide Web. El acceso puede estar limitado para las bibliotecas afiliadas a elibro. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Ciencias de la salud. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evidencia. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Guía. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Investigación. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Metaanálisis. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Revisión sistemática. | |
| 655 | 4 | |a Artículos. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jiménez, Rafael, |e autor. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gervilla, Elena, |e autor. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Montaño, Juan J., |e autor. | |
| 773 | 1 | |t Clínica y salud. |x ISSN1130-5274 |d Madrid : Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid. |g vol. 31, núm. 2 (2020), p. 77-83 | |
| 797 | 2 | |a elibro, Corp. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://elibro.net/ereader/siduncu/133886 |
