Water permits and concessions for irrigation in Argentina. Status quaestionis and trends in comparative perspective
The article analyzes permits and concession granting water rights for irrigation in the various provincial legal frameworks of Argentina. The study was structured in the light of four dimensions concerning the conditions for the access and subsistence of water rights for irrigation granted by permi...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Lenguaje: | eng |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias-UNCuyo
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/RFCA/article/view/3134 |
| id |
I11-R107article-3134 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I11-R107article-31342020-12-04T21:59:31Z Water permits and concessions for irrigation in Argentina. Status quaestionis and trends in comparative perspective Water permits and concessions for irrigation in Argentina. Status quaestionis and trends in comparative perspective Martin, Liber Pinto, Mauricio PERMISO CONCESION USO ESPECIAL DEL AGUA LEYES DE AGUAS PROPIEDAD PLAZO CADUCIDAD INHERENCIA PERMITS CONCESSION WATER RIGHTS WATER LAWS PROPERTY TERM RIGHTS FORFEITURE INHERENCE The article analyzes permits and concession granting water rights for irrigation in the various provincial legal frameworks of Argentina. The study was structured in the light of four dimensions concerning the conditions for the access and subsistence of water rights for irrigation granted by permits and concessions; 1) ownership of the property to be irrigated; 2) the term; 3) rights forfeiture for the lack of use; and 4) the water right attachment to the property. From a comparative analysis of the regulation some trends and findings arise. Highlights Most of the provinces provide for granting the water right to person other than the landowner, showing a trend towards flexibility in this variable. Establishing reasonable terms to water rights is valued as very positive or positive, while excessive terms –long or short- are considered negative very negative. Short term forfeiture for lack of use entails a strong promotion of production, something that prevent from keeping idle flows of water and speculation. Appurtenance is considered a positive element, but it is more positive when developed together with mechanisms that allow flexibility so as to allow authorities to assess due rights reallocation. The article analyzes permits and concession granting water rights for irrigation in the various provincial legal frameworks of Argentina. The study was structured in the light of four dimensions concerning the conditions for the access and subsistence of water rights for irrigation granted by permits and concessions; 1) ownership of the property to be irrigated; 2) the term; 3) rights forfeiture for the lack of use; and 4) the water right attachment to the property. From a comparative analysis of the regulation some trends and findings arise. Highlights Most of the provinces provide for granting the water right to person other than the landowner, showing a trend towards flexibility in this variable. Establishing reasonable terms to water rights is valued as very positive or positive, while excessive terms –long or short- are considered negative very negative. Short term forfeiture for lack of use entails a strong promotion of production, something that prevent from keeping idle flows of water and speculation. Appurtenance is considered a positive element, but it is more positive when developed together with mechanisms that allow flexibility so as to allow authorities to assess due rights reallocation. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias-UNCuyo 2020-12-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/RFCA/article/view/3134 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo; Vol. 52 No. 2 (2020): June-December; 204-214 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo; Vol. 52 Núm. 2 (2020): Julio-Diciembre; 204-214 1853-8665 0370-4661 eng https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/RFCA/article/view/3134/2852 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Cuyo |
| building |
Revistas en línea |
| filtrotop_str |
Revistas en línea |
| collection |
Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias |
| journal_title_str |
Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias |
| institution_str |
I-11 |
| repository_str |
R-107 |
| language |
eng |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Martin, Liber Pinto, Mauricio |
| spellingShingle |
Martin, Liber Pinto, Mauricio Water permits and concessions for irrigation in Argentina. Status quaestionis and trends in comparative perspective PERMISO CONCESION USO ESPECIAL DEL AGUA LEYES DE AGUAS PROPIEDAD PLAZO CADUCIDAD INHERENCIA PERMITS CONCESSION WATER RIGHTS WATER LAWS PROPERTY TERM RIGHTS FORFEITURE INHERENCE |
| author_facet |
Martin, Liber Pinto, Mauricio |
| author_sort |
Martin, Liber |
| title |
Water permits and concessions for irrigation in Argentina. Status quaestionis and trends in comparative perspective |
| title_short |
Water permits and concessions for irrigation in Argentina. Status quaestionis and trends in comparative perspective |
| title_full |
Water permits and concessions for irrigation in Argentina. Status quaestionis and trends in comparative perspective |
| title_fullStr |
Water permits and concessions for irrigation in Argentina. Status quaestionis and trends in comparative perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Water permits and concessions for irrigation in Argentina. Status quaestionis and trends in comparative perspective |
| title_sort |
water permits and concessions for irrigation in argentina. status quaestionis and trends in comparative perspective |
| description |
The article analyzes permits and concession granting water rights for irrigation in the various provincial legal frameworks of Argentina. The study was structured in the light of four dimensions concerning the conditions for the access and subsistence of water rights for irrigation granted by permits and concessions; 1) ownership of the property to be irrigated; 2) the term; 3) rights forfeiture for the lack of use; and 4) the water right attachment to the property. From a comparative analysis of the regulation some trends and findings arise.
Highlights
Most of the provinces provide for granting the water right to person other than the landowner, showing a trend towards flexibility in this variable.
Establishing reasonable terms to water rights is valued as very positive or positive, while excessive terms –long or short- are considered negative very negative.
Short term forfeiture for lack of use entails a strong promotion of production, something that prevent from keeping idle flows of water and speculation.
Appurtenance is considered a positive element, but it is more positive when developed together with mechanisms that allow flexibility so as to allow authorities to assess due rights reallocation.
|
| publisher |
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias-UNCuyo |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/RFCA/article/view/3134 |
| topic |
PERMISO CONCESION USO ESPECIAL DEL AGUA LEYES DE AGUAS PROPIEDAD PLAZO CADUCIDAD INHERENCIA PERMITS CONCESSION WATER RIGHTS WATER LAWS PROPERTY TERM RIGHTS FORFEITURE INHERENCE |
| topic_facet |
PERMISO CONCESION USO ESPECIAL DEL AGUA LEYES DE AGUAS PROPIEDAD PLAZO CADUCIDAD INHERENCIA PERMITS CONCESSION WATER RIGHTS WATER LAWS PROPERTY TERM RIGHTS FORFEITURE INHERENCE |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT martinliber waterpermitsandconcessionsforirrigationinargentinastatusquaestionisandtrendsincomparativeperspective AT pintomauricio waterpermitsandconcessionsforirrigationinargentinastatusquaestionisandtrendsincomparativeperspective |
| _version_ |
1800220907600347136 |
