Differences in stomatal responses and root to shoot signalling between two grapevine varieties subjected to drought
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Functional plant biology |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Sin ejemplares |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Colección: | Functional plant biology v. 37, no. 2 (2010), p. 139-146 |
| Materias: | |
| Publicación relacionada: | Contenido en:
Functional plant biology |
| LEADER | 00976cab#a22003374c#4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OAGANASID099803 | ||
| 003 | OAG | ||
| 008 | 100628s2010 ||| | |||| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | # | # | |a OAG |b spa |c OAG |e rda |
| 041 | 0 | # | |a eng |b eng |
| 092 | # | # | |s HEMEROTECA |
| 100 | 1 | # | |a Beis, Aexandros |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Differences in stomatal responses and root to shoot signalling between two grapevine varieties subjected to drought |
| 336 | # | # | |a texto |b txt |2 rdacontent |
| 337 | # | # | |a no mediado |b n |2 rdamedia |
| 338 | # | # | |a volumen |b nc |2 rdacarrier |
| 650 | # | 4 | |a Viticultura |
| 650 | # | 4 | |a Vid |
| 650 | # | 4 | |a Vitis vinifera |
| 650 | # | 4 | |a Variedades |
| 650 | # | 4 | |a Sequía |
| 650 | # | 4 | |a Estoma |
| 650 | # | 4 | |a Raíces |
| 650 | # | 4 | |a Acido abscísico |
| 650 | # | 4 | |a Transpiración |
| 650 | # | 4 | |a Permeabilidad |
| 653 | # | # | |a Conductancia estomática |
| 653 | # | # | |a Conductividad hidráulica |
| 700 | 1 | # | |a Patakas, Angelos |
| 773 | 0 | # | |t Functional plant biology |g v. 37, no. 2 (2010), p. 139-146 |
| 999 | # | # | |a Clara |
