El profesional de la salud y la telemedicina
Objective: To stablish use, interest and acceptance of telemedicine (Tm) in the field of health professionals in the COVID 19 pandemic. Materials and methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study, developed through a structured, self-administered, anonymous survey, carried out to health personnel. Com...
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Revista Médica Universitaria |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/fichas.php?idobjeto=16317 |
| autor_str_mv |
Carena, José Anci, Cynthia Elaskar, María Salomón, Susana Elsa Solavallone, Vanina Valli Caparroz, Diego |
|---|---|
| todos_str_mv |
1221 16310 HospLagClinMed HospLagClinMed HospLagClinMed HospLagClinMed HospLagClinMed HospLagClinMed Investigación Científica Inédita spa UNCuyo FCM UNCuyo FCM |
| disciplina_str_mv |
Ciencias e Investigación Ciencias médicas |
| titulo_str_mv |
El profesional de la salud y la telemedicina |
| description_str_mv |
Objective: To stablish use, interest and acceptance of telemedicine (Tm) in the field of health professionals in the COVID 19 pandemic.
Materials and methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study, developed through a structured, self-administered, anonymous survey, carried out to health personnel. Comparative analysis between clinicians and other professionals. Statistical analysis: made with Epi Info, central tendency measures and Fisher exact test. Criterion significance p<0.05.
Results: 105 health professionals were included, 50.5% male, mean age 48.8 years; 97% were doctors. 46% check cell phone immediately upon waking up, 10.5% within half an hour and 6% upon arrival at work; 55% think that Tm brought benefits before pandemic and 30% had not considered it; 55% used technology in doctor-patient relationship. Reasons for not using Tm: 37% despersonalization, 28% lack of experience and 25% due to patient characteristics; 78% change their minds regarding Tm in daily care during the pandemic. Reasons: utility 52%, not to be left out of the system 14%; 26% are concerned about legal use. Best application for Tm: 61.5% consults, 55% interconsultations with other specialists, 19% diagnosis. Preference for virtual communication with patients: Whatsapp 81%, telephone 38.5%, videocall 19%; 72% do not receive remuneration; 60% will continue to use Tm after the pandemic, 24% prefer face-to-face consults. Have two telephones (personal and Tm) 21%. Feels that Tm adds up 55%, solves problems 30%, is enslaving 11.5%; 87.5% think that it will not be discontinued. Comparative analysis: clinicians use Tm in pandemic because they have no other alternative and after this, they have decided not to use it on daily routine (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Tm in pandemic has impregnate profesional practice, overcoming barriers and promoting accessibility. Nevertheless, there is no adequate regulation. However, Tm is here to stay. Objetivo: Establecer el uso, interés y aceptación de la Telemedicina (Tm) en el ámbito de profesionales de salud en pandemia COVID 19. Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo y transversal, a través de una encuesta estructurada, autoadministrada, anónima, realizada a personal de salud. Análisis comparativo entre médicos clínicos y otros profesionales médicos. Análisis estadístico: realizado con Epi Info, medidas tendencia central y test exacto Fisher. Criterio significación p<0.05. Resultados: Se incluyeron 105 profesionales de la salud, 50.5% de género masculino, edad media 48.8 años; 97% eran médicos. El 46% revisa el celular de manera inmediata al despertarse, 10.5% a la media hora y 6% al llegar al trabajo; 55% piensan que la Tm traía beneficios antes de la pandemia y 30% no se lo había planteado; 55% usaba tecnología en la relación médico paciente. Motivos de no usarla: despersonalización 37%, falta de experiencia 28% y 25% por características de los pacientes; 78% cambió de idea respecto a Tm en la asistencia cotidiana durante la pandemia. Motivos: utilidad 52%, obligación para no quedar fuera del sistema 14%. Al 26% le preocupa el uso por lo legal. Mejor aplicación para Tm: 61.5% consultas, 55% interconsultas, 19% diagnósticos. Preferencia para comunicación virtual con pacientes: Whatsapp 81%, teléfono 38.5%, videollamada 19%. El 72% no recibe remuneración; 60% continuará usando Tm luego de la pandemia, 24% prefiere la consulta presencial. Tienen dos teléfonos (personal y Tm) 21%. Siente que Tm suma 55%, soluciona problemas 30%, resulta esclavizante 11.5%. El 87.5% piensa que no se dejará de usar. Análisis comparativo: los médicos clínicos no consideraban a la Tm como beneficiosa antes de la pandemia y expresaron un cambio de perspectiva a favor luego de la misma (p<0.05). Conclusión: La Tm en pandemia ha impregnado el ejercicio profesional, superando barreras y promoviendo la accesibilidad. Sin embargo, no existe una adecuada regulación. A pesar de esto, se deja vislumbrar que la Tm llegó para quedarse. |
| descriptores_str_mv |
Teleasistencia Teleconsulta Telemedicina |
| object_type_str_mv |
Textual: Revistas |
| id |
16317 |
| plantilla_str |
Artículo de Revista |
| record_format |
article |
| container_title |
Revista Médica Universitaria |
| journal_title_str |
Revista Médica Universitaria |
| journal_id_str |
r-1221 |
| container_issue |
Revista Médica Universitaria |
| container_volume |
Vol. 17 no. 1 |
| journal_issue_str |
Vol. 17 no. 1 |
| tipo_str |
textuales |
| type_str_mv |
Articulos |
| title_full |
El profesional de la salud y la telemedicina |
| title_fullStr |
El profesional de la salud y la telemedicina El profesional de la salud y la telemedicina |
| title_full_unstemmed |
El profesional de la salud y la telemedicina El profesional de la salud y la telemedicina |
| description |
Objective: To stablish use, interest and acceptance of telemedicine (Tm) in the field of health professionals in the COVID 19 pandemic.
Materials and methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study, developed through a structured, self-administered, anonymous survey, carried out to health personnel. Comparative analysis between clinicians and other professionals. Statistical analysis: made with Epi Info, central tendency measures and Fisher exact test. Criterion significance p<0.05.
Results: 105 health professionals were included, 50.5% male, mean age 48.8 years; 97% were doctors. 46% check cell phone immediately upon waking up, 10.5% within half an hour and 6% upon arrival at work; 55% think that Tm brought benefits before pandemic and 30% had not considered it; 55% used technology in doctor-patient relationship. Reasons for not using Tm: 37% despersonalization, 28% lack of experience and 25% due to patient characteristics; 78% change their minds regarding Tm in daily care during the pandemic. Reasons: utility 52%, not to be left out of the system 14%; 26% are concerned about legal use. Best application for Tm: 61.5% consults, 55% interconsultations with other specialists, 19% diagnosis. Preference for virtual communication with patients: Whatsapp 81%, telephone 38.5%, videocall 19%; 72% do not receive remuneration; 60% will continue to use Tm after the pandemic, 24% prefer face-to-face consults. Have two telephones (personal and Tm) 21%. Feels that Tm adds up 55%, solves problems 30%, is enslaving 11.5%; 87.5% think that it will not be discontinued. Comparative analysis: clinicians use Tm in pandemic because they have no other alternative and after this, they have decided not to use it on daily routine (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Tm in pandemic has impregnate profesional practice, overcoming barriers and promoting accessibility. Nevertheless, there is no adequate regulation. However, Tm is here to stay. |
| dependencia_str_mv |
Facultad de Ciencias Médicas |
| title |
El profesional de la salud y la telemedicina |
| spellingShingle |
El profesional de la salud y la telemedicina Teleasistencia Teleconsulta Telemedicina Carena, José Anci, Cynthia Elaskar, María Salomón, Susana Elsa Solavallone, Vanina Valli Caparroz, Diego |
| topic |
Teleasistencia Teleconsulta Telemedicina |
| topic_facet |
Teleasistencia Teleconsulta Telemedicina |
| author |
Carena, José Anci, Cynthia Elaskar, María Salomón, Susana Elsa Solavallone, Vanina Valli Caparroz, Diego |
| author_facet |
Carena, José Anci, Cynthia Elaskar, María Salomón, Susana Elsa Solavallone, Vanina Valli Caparroz, Diego |
| title_sort |
El profesional de la salud y la telemedicina |
| title_short |
El profesional de la salud y la telemedicina |
| url |
https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/fichas.php?idobjeto=16317 |
| estado_str |
3 |
| building |
Biblioteca Digital |
| filtrotop_str |
Biblioteca Digital |
| collection |
Artículo de Revista |
| institution |
Sistema Integrado de Documentación |
| indexed_str |
2023-04-25 00:34 |
| _version_ |
1764120096750436352 |
