La ciencia de las causas primeras en Aristóteles, Metafísica A, 1-3
Aristotle, at first, identifies the knowing with experience, which represents the unity of a multiplicity. But then, in its proper sense, the knowing is identified with art or science, in virtue of what it differentiates it from experience. The difference is that experience is knowledge of individua...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/philosophia/article/view/1846 |
| Sumario: | Aristotle, at first, identifies the knowing with experience, which represents the unity of a multiplicity. But then, in its proper sense, the knowing is identified with art or science, in virtue of what it differentiates it from experience. The difference is that experience is knowledge of individuals and art or science of universals.From this difference, the conception of first philosophy as science of first causes is presented in order to better understand the crisis of experience, both in the theoretical and in the ethical-political field. The aim of this paper consists on an exposition of the aitiological (aitía) dimension of philosophy, that may respond to crisis of experience from Metaphysics A, 1-3. |
|---|
